Reading your text, I remember to the studies of emotions and how Adam Smith was so Injustified and misinterpreted with the interpretation of his agent as purely selfish and isolated from collective interests. The nonperception of dualism was central to the sectarian advances of the neoclassical strand insofar as they ignored the complexity of the psychological foundations underlying human behavior.
The incorporation of the Newtonian perspective of apprehension of the elements of the world with sufficient material attachment gave consistency to the Smithian view of subject, material and immaterial, in the figure of his mind and body, being fully realized when put into society.
The individual, when assumed unidimensional and synthetic, the neoclassical, is understood as the center of a system that reproduces it in a larger, deductive and logical plane. However, when understood in its multiple dimensions, one assumes the emergent repercussion of his individual acts, but in a complex world that attenuates its multiplicity and can not be reduced to a simple linear and deductive plane.

I appreciate your work in an attempt to take up fundamental elements raised by Adam Smith in the questioning of fundamental points today. I would like to contact you and maybe work together.