<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>reflexivity &#8211; Economic Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://economicphilosophy2017.weaconferences.net/tag/reflexivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://economicphilosophy2017.weaconferences.net</link>
	<description>Complexities in Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 12:42:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Agent-Based Modeling’s Open Methodology Approach:Simulation, Reflexivity, and Abduction</title>
		<link>https://economicphilosophy2017.weaconferences.net/papers/agent-based-modelings-open-methodology-approachsimulation-reflexivity-and-abduction/</link>
					<comments>https://economicphilosophy2017.weaconferences.net/papers/agent-based-modelings-open-methodology-approachsimulation-reflexivity-and-abduction/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johndavis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Methodological Dimension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agent-based modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generative science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflexivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simulation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economicphilosophy2017.weaconferences.net/?post_type=wea_paper&#038;p=205</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This paper argues that agent-based modeling’s innovations in method developed in terms of simulation techniques also involve an innovation in economic methodology. It shows how Epstein’s generative science conception departs from conventional methodological reasoning, and employs what I term an &#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This paper argues that agent-based modeling’s innovations in method developed in terms of simulation techniques also involve an innovation in economic methodology. It shows how Epstein’s generative science conception departs from conventional methodological reasoning, and employs what I term an open rather than closed approach to economic methodology associated with the roles that reflexivity, counterfactual reasoning, and abduction play in ABM. Central to this idea is that improvements in how we know something, a matter of method, determine whether we know something, a matter of methodology. The paper links this alternative view of economics and economic methodology to a social science model of economics and contrasts this with standard economics’ natural science model of economics. The paper discusses what this methodological understanding implies about the concept of emergence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://economicphilosophy2017.weaconferences.net/papers/agent-based-modelings-open-methodology-approachsimulation-reflexivity-and-abduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Cognitive Behavioral Modelling for Coping with Intractable Complex Phenomena in Economics and Social Science: Deep Complexity</title>
		<link>https://economicphilosophy2017.weaconferences.net/papers/a-cognitive-behavioral-modelling-for-coping-with-intractable-complex-phenomena-in-economics-and-social-science-deep-complexity/</link>
					<comments>https://economicphilosophy2017.weaconferences.net/papers/a-cognitive-behavioral-modelling-for-coping-with-intractable-complex-phenomena-in-economics-and-social-science-deep-complexity/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johndavis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Keynote papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive behavioral modelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Complexity Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non- commutative complementarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phenomenal intractability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedural theorizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflexivity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economicphilosophy2017.weaconferences.net/?post_type=wea_paper&#038;p=191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is argued in this paper that there is an issue of complex phenomenal intractability in economics, in particular, and in social science in general, and that it is unduly neglected in theorizing in these areas. This intractability is complex &#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is argued in this paper that there is an issue of complex phenomenal intractability in economics, in particular, and in social science in general, and that it is unduly neglected in theorizing in these areas. This intractability is complex because it is an offspring of certain complex phenomena. It is phenomenal because it relates to empirical phenomena, which distinguishes it from conceptual and computational approaches to intractability and complexity. Among the possible reasons for this neglect, one is, in established complexity theory, the focus on computer simulations which seemingly solve for analytical sources of intractability. Another one is the relegation of intractability proper to theoretical computer science. Yet the empirical inquiries that originated this research reveal significant cases of intractable complex phenomena that are accommodated neither by existing complexity theory nor by the theory of computational intractability. The task ahead is therefore to construct a theory of complexity with phenomenal intractability. A reflexive cognitive behavioral modelling is developed and tested through its application. It results in what may be called a Deep Complexity Procedure. Its implications for economic and social theorizing are discussed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://economicphilosophy2017.weaconferences.net/papers/a-cognitive-behavioral-modelling-for-coping-with-intractable-complex-phenomena-in-economics-and-social-science-deep-complexity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
